Mon 23 Jan 2012 |
|
RAC Region A Posts Issues by Major Diagnostic Category |
|
|
|
| 

DCS Healthcare has changed how it posts issues from listing individual MS-DRGs to major diagnostic categories (MDCs).
Providers should note that each category includes several MS-DRGs that the Region A recovery auditor (RAC) will review. For example, MDC 5 (diseases and disorders of the circulatory system) lists eight MS-DRGs, including MS-DRG 239 (amputation for circulatory system disorders except upper limb and toe with major complications and comorbidities) and MS-DRG 298 (cardiac arrest, unexplained without complications and comorbidities or major complications and comorbidities).
|
|
Read more...
|
Wed 18 Jan 2012 |
|
CMS Updates its Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation |
|
|
|
|
Written by Melanie Combs-Dyer, RN
|
|
| | Healthcare providers who receive documentation request letters from Medicare Review Contractors can now respond electronically. Until now, providers had only twp options: mail or fax. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) calls the new mechanism Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation, or esMD.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Tue 17 Jan 2012 |
|
RACTrac Survey Reveals More Realities of Hospital Audits |
|
|
|
|
Written by Kim T. Charland, BA, RHIT, CCS
|
|
| | Most of the medical-necessity denials uncovered by complex reviews conducted by recovery audit contractors (RACs) come down to one-day stays in medical/surgical acute-care hospitals. The interesting thing about this is that the denials occurred because the service provided was provided in the wrong setting. RACs collected $89 million of overpayments from the group of hospitals that reported this piece of data to the American Hospital Association (AHA) for its latest RACTrac Survey (November 21, 2011 report).
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Tue 17 Jan 2012 |
|
More Providers Budgeting for RAC Recoupments |
|
|
|
| Heeding songwriter Steven Bishop's old refrain, "you better save it for a rainy day," 52 percent of respondents to an online survey reported that they are budgeting for a reserve fund based upon past RAC experiences.
The survey was conducted Monday during Monitor Monday, a weekly podcast produced by RACmonitor. Behind that group were the 20 percent of respondents who stated that they were budgeting for their reserve fund based on published industry standards. Interestingly, 25 percent responded with the answer "fingers crossed or no reserves or insurance." To the latter point, 1 percent had purchased RAC-specific insurance, while another 2 percent responded that they had an add-on to reinsurance or had a stop-loss policy.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|